Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Glee-related babble

I'm not watching Glee, but I do read some recaps (done by TLo, aka "the Project Rungay boys" from the old name of their blog) and watch clips of songs I'm interested in. I'm gonna have to pry some money loose from the budget to buy a few of those clips. In particular, I definitely want the NPH "Dream On", and "Baby, It's Cold Outside" from the Christmas episode.

I swear that Chris Colfer sounds more like a girl than I do. :D It's just... I've always had a kinda low voice for a woman, and it's just gotten lower as I've gotten older. My singing voice is shot to hell lately anyhow—not that you'll ever hear it because it records like total crap, even if it sounds fine in person—but I seem to have fallen down into the tenor range, or some midpoint between tenor and alto, depending on how you measure.

Oh, there's one other song I know I want to get from the Glee soundtracks, but I hate to admit it because I typically tend to actively avoid any pop singer with a hype machine larger than Madonna's. But, I must admit, their cover of "Telephone" got stuck in my head pretty hard. I went and found the video for the original, so I've heard that now too, and I do kinda like it but I like the cover better for some reason (maybe because I saw it in context and the context was funny).

Thursday, December 9, 2010

An open letter to the wing-nuts

Dear American Wing-nuts,

Pray, enlighten me: when did Australia become a U.S. state? Was it right after Canada was annexed*? Because apparently I missed it.

Look, I realize that you're genetically programmed** to respond to any criticism of the United States or anything that you think threatens the pocketbooks of big businesswar effort, but you might want to try thinking a little about the stupidity of calls to prosecute Julian Assange for treason.

You see, to commit treason, you have to actually be a citizen of the country you're working against.*** I realize this is hard for you to grasp, but not everyone is a citizen of the United States. Assange is an Australian citizen. It is impossible for him to commit treason against the United States.

I'm not going to argue about the rightness or wrongness of Assange's acts. I don't care whether you think he was right or wrong. That's not the issue. The issue is: you're a bunch of morons who don't understand that citizens in other countries aren't bound by the laws of the United States.

Happy holidays!****

Love,

Me

* Note for the easily confused: this hasn't happened. If it had, you'd have better health insurance. And nicer neighbors.
** Well, probably just stupid and/or reflexive, but I'm trying to be nice here. Only not really.
*** This presupposes it's fair to say Assange is 'working against' the U.S., but I didn't want to complicate this too much by getting into that argument.
**** You should probably see a doctor about that blood pressure spike you have whenever someone says that.

Friday, October 29, 2010

One last PR post

I'm now kinda glad I wasn't able to spend more time doing recaps, but that's not what I'm gonna talk about. I'm gonna talk about the actual three finalists' collections and what I thought about them.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Well, that's one less show I'm watching again

Dear Nina Garcia and Michael Kors,

You have lost all credibility with me. Seriously.

I've been disagreeing with your choices for a while, sure. But this season, not only have I disagreed with you, I've started to wonder if you actually do have any real idea what's going on in the fashion world.

You just gave Gretchen the win over Mondo. And I'm pissed off about that, yes, but it's not just because I think Mondo is by far the better designer. It's also because of the bullshit that came out of your mouths in justifying it.

You see... I've been paying a lot more attention to the runway and the fashion world in general since I started watching this show, and you know what I haven't seen recently? Anything that looks much like the 70's aesthetic animal print stuff Gretchen did. In fact, I'm looking at Marie Claire's web site right now, and do you know what I am seeing? Clothes that look far more like what Mondo did than what Gretchen did. In fact, in specific, on the Fashion News page, I see one thing using almost the same pink and aqua I saw in Mondo's collection, and another using a black and white print.

Whose finger again is on the pulse of fashion trends?

Apparently not yours.

Sincerely,

Someone whose Thursday nights look to be staying free for the forseeable future.

Thursday, September 30, 2010

PR: Lifetime Sucks

No, seriously. I just went to try to go look at finishing up E2 and found out they have taken down the full episodes for everything prior to E6. That means the four hours or so I spent on the E2 recap was a total waste, because no way to finish that one without the video handy. Oh, I probably could go dig up some other people's recaps and figure out which designers I hadn't yet managed to get to and get them in the right order, but, well, screw it. I'll just skip up to E6 and straight into my "shorter recaps" plan, and be caught up that much sooner, I guess. If I ever get ahold of E2 video again I might go ahead and finish it, but probably not.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

PR recaps; Top Chef; Top Chef: Just Desserts

Because of the length of time it takes me to write a recap like the one I did for S8 E1—it's a good 5-6 hours of watching for a few seconds, pausing, and writing something, then starting the video up again—I'm clearly not going to get caught up. I'm going to try to finish up the one for E2 anyhow, since I was near the end of it, but then I'm going to try to find a way to write much leaner recaps for the rest. No promises, though; my painkillers aren't, lately.

On Top Chef DC: Totally disappointing season. I didn't really ever connect with someone I wanted to root for—the closest I came was deciding to root for Tiffany, and then she got eliminated right after I decided that—and one of the people I thought was not all that strong a chef won. Whoopie-doo. And apparently the next season of Top Chef is going to be an "All-Stars", starting in December. I haven't decided how I feel about that. It includes people from every season, many of whom made it near or into the finale but didn't win. (Thank goodness it doesn't include winners, or I might have to see that cockmeister Ilan again. Seriously, guys: stop inviting that douchebag back, okay?)

Top Chef: Just Desserts is probably not going to hold my attention. Basically, most of the contestants annoy me, and of the few I kinda liked, two are already gone. But I'll give it another couple episodes. And that's... seriously all I have to say about it.

The official lineup of Top Chef: All-Stars has already been announced, and I have some opinions:

Things I don't get

Here's one thing I don't get: A lot of people seem to think the Republicans are being taken over by crazy right-wing extremists, but also think the Democrats are a bunch of liars who make promises about how they're going to change things but then support the status quo. So, uh... why is no one seeing "vote for a third-party candidate" as the obvious answer? I mean, here we have a fair bit of evidence the two-party system just is not working for us, and yet... somehow it doesn't occur to people to try to change that.

Here's another thing I don't get: Why is it so hard for people to accept the word "moderate" means "actually holds positions in between the 'left' and 'right' positions", and that people who demonstrably don't do that aren't really moderates? No one seems to have a problem calling people on labeling themselves "liberal" and yet expressing non-liberal positions, or people labeling themselves "conservative" and yet expressing non-conservative positions. But if you call yourself a "moderate" yet express non-moderate positions, people will apparenty use this as "evidence" that "moderate" means something other than, well, moderate.

Here's another thing I don't get: The context of the following quote is that the Texas Board of Education—that bastion of eliminating accuracy in the name of upholding their narrow views, but I guess that's another topic—has decided that there is a bias in textbooks promoting Islam and condemning Christianity.
In interviews, Mr. Rives has likened his concerns about Islam to those he and other Americans once had about communists infiltrating American society. [source]
Why would anyone think this was a good position to publically take? The Americans who once had "concerns about communist infiltration" included people who did things such as use blacklists to keep people from being hired based purely on accusation, rather than evidence, and those people are fairly widely regarded as having been extremists and witch-hunters who damaged American society and played fast and loose with the rule of law. Why would anyone want to associate themselves with that?

Thursday, August 19, 2010

PR recaps

I'm mostly done with my episode 2 recap, but I'm really distracted by all the info coming out on Guild Wars 2, I'm afraid, so it's not going up before the show. I'll get that up maybe tomorrow, and try to have 3 and 4 done before next week, and then do my best to start getting a more timely recap up, though no promises until my doctor decides to give me a better painkiller for my back problems.

Friday, August 13, 2010

Project Runway S8, E1: "And Sew It Begins"

Last season of Project Runway, I made a stab at doing a dress overview with my opinions of it, with a couple comments here and there on the episodes, and then realized I couldn't keep up and stopped trying until the end. This season I figured I just would be better off not trying, but you know what? I've got some free time and am sitting at the computer anyhow, so I think I'm gonna try again... and I even am going to do more of a "real" recap! Until, you know, I start getting behind and only throw up notes about the dresses and then stop being able to keep up. No, no, wait. Positive thinking! Recaps! Let's roll back the clock and start with episode 1 because I'm already behind! Fair warning: this is quite long.

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Er... no thanks.

From my local paper today:
Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group is teaming up with a Silicon Valley start-up to reward smartphone-equipped shoppers for walking into Simon's shopping malls.

The partnership with technology company Shopkick Inc. is a big step in realizing retailers' long-held dream of using cell phones to beam ads and coupons to people passing by to convert them into buyers.

I think someone needs to look up the definition of "reward". I'm pretty sure it doesn't mean the same thing as "annoy".

Monday, August 9, 2010

Top Chef & Project Runway

Here's my reaction to Top Chef so far: x.x

Monday, July 5, 2010

That word you keep using...

"Israel will never apologize for defending its citizens," a high-ranking Israeli government official told CNN Monday, after Turkey reportedly demanded an apology or an inquiry into an Israeli raid on an aid ship that killed nine Turkish citizens.

"Of course we regret the loss of life, but it was not the Israeli side that initiated the violence," the official said.

Yes, it was. Armed men rapelling onto boats from military helicopters is an act of aggression. Threatening people with those armed men is an act of aggression. The people who engaged in self-defense were those who attempted to repel the pirates.

Yes, I said pirates. That's what we call armed forces that board boats in international waters with the intention of securing control of said boats (outside of war). Israel was not in a state of war with Turkey. (Though they sure seem to want to be.)

And there would have been no need for the Israeli military to "defend" themselves if they hadn't deliberately gone onto those boats with armed men with the intent to commit violence in international waters.

(I realize there is a great deal of legal debate on whether or not this was acceptable legally. I note, however, that there is a great deal of legal debate, rather than it being cut and dried. Just once, I'd like to see the Israeli government admit they've made a mistake with their responses of overwhelming force. But I'm not holding my breath.)

Friday, June 18, 2010

Top Chef DC Initial Impressions

So, as usual with the first episode, I barely remember anyone's names or much about their actual dishes, but a few things did stand out:
  • Dude with the dreads. Sorry, I know this is shallow, but to be honest I'm kinda glad I'm not going to have to be creeped out by his hair anymore. I know that dreads are just as likely to be clean as some random sweaty chef's hair, and he wore a bandana to keep 'em out of the way, but seriously, dude's hair scared me. Also, if the dish you make to represent yourself and where you're from is something I can make at home, you probably aren't quite ready for Top Chef. No offense.
  • Big chick with a big mouth... I thought at first I might like her, until she decided to call another contestant a hick and implied that would mean he sucked. Yeah, I didn't see you in the top 4, babe. Maybe keep a lid on the insults til you show you're any good either, k?
  • Kenny is freakin' fast at the mis en place. Doesn't guarantee he's good (but the top four placement in Elimination Challenge does tend to suggest he is), but, wow. I think I'd still be working on the onions, myself...
  • On the other hand, dude needs to learn how to lose gracefully. Seriously.
  • And speaking of someone who's gonna have to learn to lose: Angelo? Is that his name? The one who won, with the attitude and the smug and the self-absorption and the admittedly good-sounding dish? Yeah. You aren't gonna win all the challenges. Trust me.
  • I hope the culinary instructor lady kicks some serious ass this season, because I'm sick of all the winners being young-ass kids. She seems to be pretty collected, so hopefully she'll do well under pressure. Don't know what I thought of her food, though.
  • Kenny and Angelo may've clearly set the "people to beat" mark, but... Alex? Russian dude. *just goes and looks it up* Yeah, Alex. Anyhow, deconstructed borscht that actually sounded kinda good? Sounds like he's got some interesting ideas, at least.

Maybe by next week I'll remember more people's names...

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Playlist: 1979

[Warning: This Post Contains Many, Many Words Below the Cut.]

Let's go back a couple years from the last playlist. As before, the flash object below the cut is an embedded playlist of American Top 40 hits I liked, this time from 1979.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Playlist: 1981

[Warning: This Post Contains Many, Many Words Below the Cut.]

The flash object below the cut is a playlist of songs that were either Billboard or American Top 40 hits in 1981 (back when it was hosted by Casey Kasem, for those of you old enough to remember that). It's obviously not even close to all the hits on either chart, but it's a good cross-section of music I actually enjoyed listening to.

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Things I Learned From TV, Part 1

Got blue balls? There's an app for that!

A commercial advertising something called "Juicy TV", which appears to involve very large-breasted women, touted their service, which apparently includes an iPhone app. The statement above was not literally in the commercial, but it sure seemed to be the message.

Commercials with the sound off can be strange.

Based solely on the visuals, I believe that the message of a recent Snickers ad is this: When you are transformed into an old woman, just eat a Snickers bar! You'll soon be transformed back to your virile male self.

Sadly, the sound being on would probably confirm this was basically the message.

Things from bad movies are, well, bad.

Lesson for Saturday: if you try to hit ScaryDemonGuy with a car, and he jump/walks his way over it instead? Chances are, the same thing will happen when you put the car in reverse and try again.

I didn't catch the name of the movie, but the 10 minutes we saw was pretty bad.

Friday, April 30, 2010

Here's something I'm sick of...

I'm sick of people categorizing moderates as wishy-washy and unable to make up their minds, especially if they're willing to compromise on certain points.

First off, political opinions do not just come in "left" and "right". There's a whole wide spectrum. For instance, when it comes to abortion: you can be avidly for legalized abortion or avidly against it, but it's just as possible to be in favor of legalized abortion generally but also in favor of trying to minimize it through some means, or you can be against abortion generally but in favor of leaving it legal under certain circumstances. That's at least four major positions, but two of them are more moderate than the others. It's a complex issue; it can have complex positions.

Also, taking a compromise position takes both empathy for people one doesn't entirely agree with and the ability to discard preconceived notions in favor of examining the various positions to try to find where opinions are either more similar than one might have originally thought, or find where complex opinions have points that people are not as fervent about. It quite often accomplishes nothing to just keep on insisting Your Way prevails over Their Way; decisions are hard to make when no one can agree. Coming up with a suggestion that's "close enough to Our Way to be satisfactory" will be more effective in many cases. Just because it can take longer doesn't make it "wishy-washy"; it just makes it careful.

And frankly, the world could use more people willing to be careful.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Misread

What it said: mythological conspiracy.
What I read: mycological conspiracy.
What I pictured: Nazi mushrooms.
What you probably just did: rolled your eyes and suppressed laughter.

Friday, April 23, 2010

Project Runway Finale: Pretty Darn Good

On the off chance there's anyone a) reading this blog, who b) hasn't seen it, have a jump tag. Oh, and warning: it's very, very wordy.

Friday, April 9, 2010

PR Pre-Finale Impressions

Should I go again with the excuses I could make about why I haven't done any more episode reviews? Naah, just fill in whatever reason you like. Anyhow, cut for anyone who hasn't seen the episode yet.

Sunday, April 4, 2010

And another thing...

So, the teabaggers, or tea partiers, or whatever they're calling themselves this week... basically a lot of them are objecting to our national debt going up because of "Obamacare", right?

Where the heck were all these people during the Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II years?

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Yeah, that's the answer [updated]

AP: Bricks have been hurled through Democrats' windows, a propane line was cut at the home of a congressman's brother and lawmakers who voted for a federal health care bill have received obscenity-laced phone threats in the days before and after passage of the sweeping legislation.

Yeah, guys, that's doing a lot for your image as reasonable people who should ever be listened to, there.

House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio said in a statement that while many Americans are angry over passage of the health care bill, "violence and threats are unacceptable.

"That's not the American way," Boehner said. "We need to take that anger and channel it into positive change."

Okay, so, that's one Republican who I think has responded appropriately. Anyone else wanna step up?

Update: Add a few more to the list, including one from my home state. That's better. A little slow out of the gate, but in this case I'll go with "better late than never".

But a big thumbs-down to Eric Cantor, who used the incidents to actually complain about Democrats politicizing the incidents, in a press conference he held to... politicize the incidents.

Monday, March 22, 2010

Oh, shut up, you morons

You'd think that congress had just passed a bill outlawing stupidity, because boy are the wingnut bloggers and their commenters out in full force claiming their right to it. Obamacare sucks, I shouldn't have to pay, soshulism waah and all the other usual aside, there are actually those who are all like: Armed revolution! Secession of conservative states! You can have my insurance premiums when you pry them from my cold, dead hands!

And then there's this: "I will be forced to pay for coverage, whether I want it or not. I will be forced to pay for the coverage of others, whether I want it or not."

Yes, you will be forced to pay for coverage, whether you want it or not, as long as you are employed. That is true, and believe it or not I'm at least mildly sympathetic to the idea that people shouldn't be forced to buy health insurance. However, if you have insurance already, you are already paying for others unless you are using more than you put in. That's, y'know, how insurance works.

And what if you don't have coverage and you get hit by a car and suffer severe injuries that take many days of hospitalization, the services of multiple specialists, and so forth? Assuming you aren't wealthy (and if you are, why don't you have insurance?), you aren't going to be able to pay that off anytime soon. In fact, you probably aren't going to be able to pay it off at all. That's why there are so many bankruptcies driven by medical bills; that shit's expensive. So you end up 100 grand in debt and you end up having to file for bankruptcy and the hospital doesn't get the money but they still have to pay all those salaries and facilities costs and equipment usage costs, so they end up recouping their money by raising costs across the board for everyone else, and when the next person comes in who has the same lack of coverage for a major incident, it happens again, and then you get... what was it... oh yeah! Our current health care costs! (And yes, there are more factors than this, but this one sure doesn't help.)

And that is how you already pay for other people's health care. Getting people to get coverage even if they don't think they need it is one of the ways they're trying to make that happen less often. That may not be the perfect solution for many reasons but right now it's one of the easier ways to try to help the situation.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Good Idea, Bad Idea

Leaving your 6-year-old kid in the car while you run into a store for a few minutes, tops? Probably fine.

Leaving your 6-year-old kid in the car in winter while you shop for several hours and then lose track of the car and have to ask the cops to help you find it and him? Stupid on many, many levels.

End result? Kid in hospital for hypothermia; parent arrested for neglect; CPS taking custody of child after treatment.

Friday, March 12, 2010

Well that sucked.

Tonight was not happy PR night. Nope.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

PR S7, E7: "Hard Wear"

I hurt my back really badly right after posting about catching up, because it's kind of one of those laws of the universe that any time I try to get on top of something, my body rebels. So let's see what I can get done before tonight's episode.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Alone in the Opinionsphere

Apparently I am the only person on the entire planet who actually thought Ben's kid's dress was cute. I find that weird. I understand the people who thought it was plain, because most of the details were very subtle, but seriously, how can I be the only person who thought that a) lavender was a nice alternative to pink and b) it suited the girl's colouring really well?

Eh, oh well.

So, there's no PR this week, so I'm going to go ahead and try to get episodes 2 and 3 filled in, and then starting next week I'm going to try to actually get readers, gasp, by submitting my write-up for episode 7. Maybe I'll even throw in a "highlights" section for the pre-runway bits.

Monday, February 22, 2010

PR S7, E5: "Run for Cover"

I didn't get to this last week because I was too busy gaming. :)

PR S7, E6: "A Little Bit of Fashion"

Okay, I'm a little behind here, so let's go with the newest first and then I'll try to work some more on the skipped ones.

Friday, February 12, 2010

Okay, let me get this straight

The right-wing positions are as follows:

"Socialized medicine" is bad. The government should make sure Medicare stays viable.

Government-run anything is not as good as privatized anything. The government is handing the Moon to Russia and China by leaving space exploration to private companies.

More government spending is always bad. The two wars we're fighting need more funding and staffing.

I mean... seriously. Why haven't any of them had their heads explode yet?

Thursday, February 11, 2010

PR S7, E1: "Back to New York"

Since I've got some time and the inclination today, let's start back-filling those earlier episodes' dresses. This is going to be based primarily on the stills and whatever memory I have of how the outfits moved. I'll try hard to keep my later knowledge out of it but I can't guarantee that I won't be affected by knowing who ends up auf later.

Friday, February 5, 2010

PR S7, E4: "Design your Heart Out"

Okay, I've decided to belatedly start doing a little summation of Project Runway outfits and what I thought of them (and the judging). Maybe I'll go back and fill in the other episodes, but let's start with the most recent.

Jon Stewart Batters Blogs

So, as is my custom after Project Runway, I watched The Daily Show tonight. (I usually don't remember to turn it on the other days of the week; thankfully, the site has all the video available.) During the show, Jon Stewart did a segment on the headings of blog posts when discussing... oh, let's call them critiques of certain people. Mainly people blogging about his own critiques, though he went over a few related ones. These headings were noteable for using violent words (e.g., eviscerate, maul, hammer), and he was poking fun at this tendency.

Now, I'm not saying it wasn't funny, because, well, it was. However, I did think it was strange he was concentrating on blog headings specifically, because the practice is one that newspapers have engaged in for years in their headlines. I suppose it could be more noticeable with blogs, because whereas people who read the paper are unlikely to read more than a couple a day, blog readers frequently follow several dozen blogs. I imagine it's also more likely in political blogs as those frequently are covering disputes or discussions between people with widely divergent opinions.

But, eh, I don't know... I guess it just seemed weird that a guy whose job is basically dissecting news wouldn't at least mention that the blogs were following in newspapers' footsteps with such headlines. And when I say "weird", I mean "for some reason I've been thinking about it since the show aired 5 hours ago". Or possibly, when I say "weird", I mean "my brain".

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Project Runway is Back!

And by that, I don't mean "a new season is showing" (though, of course, it is). I mean that so far, at least, it's an interesting season!

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Um... WHAT?

So, I'm over at Passive-Aggressive Notes, when I come across this entry regarding a note put on the artificial sweetener drawer at some office. The note reads "HOW ABOUT GOING TO THE GYM INSTEAD" [ALL-CAPS and lack of punctuation preserved from original].

My initial reaction was: But... what? I mean, you... Do you... Ummmmmm.

Or, translated: Seriously, what the hell? Did non-overweight people stop using artificial sweeteners? Was there a memo? I wouldn't have gotten it, being overweight, but... was there?

Because, I mean, even leaving aside diabetics (and contrary to popular opinion, it's possible to be skinny and diabetic), what about someone who is generally in reasonable shape who just is trying to keep their unnecessary calorie intake to a minimum? I mean, sure, unless you're a serious coffee fiend or drink a lot of tea you probably aren't using a lot of calories of sugar, but even a moderate coffee-and-or-tea drinker could easily be adding 100, maybe 150 calories a day that way. Even if you aren't "dieting", that's not a bad reduction. Or if you don't care about that, it's not a bad way to reduce calories in one area that you can use to have a bigger piece of pie or a couple ounces of pretzels without increasing your overall intake.

Seriously. Do people ever stop to think... about anything?

It's like people who mock someone ordering a diet coke with their fast food. It doesn't matter how many calories the food has, you still are consuming fewer calories if you skip the sugared soda. That's how math works: when you subtract a number from a starting value, your result is a smaller value than the one you started with. (Unless you subtract a negative number, but food typically doesn't have negative calories.)

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Nappus Interruptus

Things that will wake me up, guaranteed: The sudden cessation of all white noise in the apartment coupled with the sound of four separate UPSes beeping.

Luckily, the power outage was only for a bit over an hour, as our heat depends on the power and it's, um, not warm out.